Suzuki Vitara vs Mazda CX-3
$38,490 vs $40,490. Budget turbo SUV vs Mazda's entry-level crossover.
Price Breakdown
$2,000 gap. The Vitara saves $228/year in fuel (5.8L vs 6.6L). Over 5 years that's $1,140, nearly closing the gap.
Safety Rundown
Both 5-star ANCAP with AEB, lane keep and adaptive cruise.
Feature Showdown
The CX-3 Touring gets Mazda's premium interior feel. The Vitara GLX Turbo gets a panoramic sunroof. Both have Apple CarPlay.
The Verdict
Buy the Vitara if: fuel economy, boot space and value are your priorities.
Buy the CX-3 if: you want more power, a better driving experience and longer warranty.
Compare both on CarSorted. See also: CX-3 vs Yaris Cross.
The Verdict
The Vitara is $2,000 cheaper, more fuel efficient, has a bigger boot and tows more. The CX-3 is significantly more powerful (139kW vs 95kW), quicker, and has a 5-year warranty vs 3. Buy the Vitara for practicality and economy. Buy the CX-3 for performance and peace of mind.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (7 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. All opinions are editorial and independent. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 7 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!