Nissan X-Trail vs Mazda CX-5
$47,790 vs $42,990. Nissan's e-POWER hybrid tech vs Mazda's driving purity.
Price Breakdown
$4,800 gap. The CX-5 also uses less fuel, saving $171/year. Over 5 years the total cost difference exceeds $5,600.
Safety Rundown
Both 5-star ANCAP with comprehensive safety suites including AEB, lane keep, adaptive cruise and blind spot monitoring.
Feature Showdown
The X-Trail gets a 12.3-inch screen and ProPILOT semi-autonomous driving. The CX-5 gets a 10.25-inch screen with superior interior materials.
The Verdict
Buy the CX-5 if: you want better value, more towing, and the better driving experience.
Buy the X-Trail if: you need more boot space, want e-POWER smoothness, or need a 7-seat option.
Compare both on CarSorted. See also: X-Trail vs Tucson.
The Verdict
The CX-5 is $4,800 cheaper, more fuel efficient, and tows 500kg more. The X-Trail counters with 63L more boot and significantly more torque (330Nm e-POWER). For most buyers the CX-5 is the better value. The X-Trail suits those who prioritise boot space and city driving smoothness.
Disclaimer: All information in this comparison was believed to be correct at the time of publishing (7 April 2026). Prices are manufacturer recommended retail prices (RRP) and may vary by state, dealer, and options. Driveaway costs include estimated on-road costs for Victoria. Fuel economy figures are WLTP/ADR combined cycle. Specifications can change without notice. Always verify with the manufacturer before making a purchase decision. All opinions are editorial and independent. CarSorted does not accept payment for recommendations.
Published by CarSorted Editorial Team · 7 April 2026
Comments (0)
Sign in to join the conversation
No comments yet. Be the first!